<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 341 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397398</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Impugned Order dated 20th March 2020 and the notice of demand, remanding the matter for reconsideration. It emphasized the importance of observing judicial discipline and following binding precedents. The Court directed Respondent No.3 to provide a detailed, compliant order considering the Petitioner&#039;s submissions in the reassessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 06:41:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 341 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397398</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Impugned Order dated 20th March 2020 and the notice of demand, remanding the matter for reconsideration. It emphasized the importance of observing judicial discipline and following binding precedents. The Court directed Respondent No.3 to provide a detailed, compliant order considering the Petitioner&#039;s submissions in the reassessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>