https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289720 The court held that the Tamil Nadu Act 27 of 2011 should be applied retrospectively, benefiting the petitioner. Despite the availability of an alternative remedy, the court allowed the writ petition as it raised significant legal questions. Regarding the interpretation of statutory requirements, the court deemed the seven-day notice provision as directory, not mandatory. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. The petitioner was granted four weeks to file objections, and the petition was allowed without costs. en-us Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:37:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289720 The court held that the Tamil Nadu Act 27 of 2011 should be applied retrospectively, benefiting the petitioner. Despite the availability of an alternative remedy, the court allowed the writ petition as it raised significant legal questions. Regarding the interpretation of statutory requirements, the court deemed the seven-day notice provision as directory, not mandatory. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. The petitioner was granted four weeks to file objections, and the petition was allowed without costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289720