https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289722 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by the RETURNED CANDIDATE, upholding the High Court's findings that the ELECTION PETITIONER had filed two affidavits on 20.01.2014, one of which complied with Form 25. Consequently, the election petition was valid and could proceed. The Supreme Court also allowed the appeal filed by the ELECTION PETITIONER, thereby affirming the procedural propriety of the High Court's handling of the case. en-us Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:37:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289722 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by the RETURNED CANDIDATE, upholding the High Court's findings that the ELECTION PETITIONER had filed two affidavits on 20.01.2014, one of which complied with Form 25. Consequently, the election petition was valid and could proceed. The Supreme Court also allowed the appeal filed by the ELECTION PETITIONER, thereby affirming the procedural propriety of the High Court's handling of the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289722