https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289721 The court dismissed the writ petitions filed by the tobacco dealers, ruling that the tax exemption for chewing tobacco could not be applied retrospectively. However, the court allowed the writ petitions filed by the dealers in Iron, Steel, Cement, Electric, and Electronic goods, directing that the 2011 amendment to Section 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, be applied retrospectively to correct the ambiguity from the 2008 amendment. en-us Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:37:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289721 The court dismissed the writ petitions filed by the tobacco dealers, ruling that the tax exemption for chewing tobacco could not be applied retrospectively. However, the court allowed the writ petitions filed by the dealers in Iron, Steel, Cement, Electric, and Electronic goods, directing that the 2011 amendment to Section 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, be applied retrospectively to correct the ambiguity from the 2008 amendment. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289721