https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289713 The court interpreted "arrears of rent" to include both undecreed and decreed arrears under the Control of Rent Act. The appellant's failure to pay decreed arrears within the specified time frame constituted wilful default, defined as intentional non-compliance with payment obligations. The court emphasized that past regular rent payments and the respondent's refusal of money orders did not excuse the deliberate default. The lower appellate court's decision was upheld, affirming that the intentional non-payment of decreed arrears amounted to wilful default, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Wed, 08 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289713 The court interpreted "arrears of rent" to include both undecreed and decreed arrears under the Control of Rent Act. The appellant's failure to pay decreed arrears within the specified time frame constituted wilful default, defined as intentional non-compliance with payment obligations. The court emphasized that past regular rent payments and the respondent's refusal of money orders did not excuse the deliberate default. The lower appellate court's decision was upheld, affirming that the intentional non-payment of decreed arrears amounted to wilful default, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289713