<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 708 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289709</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Corporation in appeals challenging judgments granting back wages to terminated employees. The Court emphasized that reinstatement alone does not automatically entitle an employee to back wages unless specifically directed. It highlighted the need for a detailed examination of circumstances and a specific order for back wages. The Court set aside the orders of the Labour Court and the High Court, emphasizing the importance of a specific direction for payment of back wages in industrial dispute cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 708 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289709</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Corporation in appeals challenging judgments granting back wages to terminated employees. The Court emphasized that reinstatement alone does not automatically entitle an employee to back wages unless specifically directed. It highlighted the need for a detailed examination of circumstances and a specific order for back wages. The Court set aside the orders of the Labour Court and the High Court, emphasizing the importance of a specific direction for payment of back wages in industrial dispute cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>