https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289708 The plaintiff was entitled to salary and dearness allowance during suspension, but the termination of his services was found justified due to financial misconduct. The plaintiff was granted arrears of pay but was denied a mandatory injunction to revive his life policy. The court dismissed both the appeal and cross-objections, upholding the lower court's decision and ordering costs to be paid. en-us Fri, 09 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:27:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289708 The plaintiff was entitled to salary and dearness allowance during suspension, but the termination of his services was found justified due to financial misconduct. The plaintiff was granted arrears of pay but was denied a mandatory injunction to revive his life policy. The court dismissed both the appeal and cross-objections, upholding the lower court's decision and ordering costs to be paid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289708