https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289707 Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act permits only enforcement of an existing, pre-determined monetary benefit or benefit capable of computation in money. Where an award grants reinstatement but is silent on back wages, no accrued right to back wages can be presumed from that silence, because a claim not granted is treated as denied. The Labour Court cannot use Section 33C(2) to create a new right to back wages by implication. The claim for back wages was therefore not maintainable on the basis of reinstatement alone. en-us Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:20:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289707 Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act permits only enforcement of an existing, pre-determined monetary benefit or benefit capable of computation in money. Where an award grants reinstatement but is silent on back wages, no accrued right to back wages can be presumed from that silence, because a claim not granted is treated as denied. The Labour Court cannot use Section 33C(2) to create a new right to back wages by implication. The claim for back wages was therefore not maintainable on the basis of reinstatement alone. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289707