<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 329 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397386</link>
    <description>The court held that the provisional attachment of the petitioners&#039; bank accounts under Section 83 of the GST Act had expired as of 27.05.2020, one year from the date of the order. Consequently, the court directed the respondents to defreeze the accounts within two weeks. The main petition and interim application were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 329 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397386</link>
      <description>The court held that the provisional attachment of the petitioners&#039; bank accounts under Section 83 of the GST Act had expired as of 27.05.2020, one year from the date of the order. Consequently, the court directed the respondents to defreeze the accounts within two weeks. The main petition and interim application were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>