<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 108 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22982</link>
    <description>The High Court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that she was entitled to the development rebate under section 33 despite the conversion of businesses into partnership concerns. The court emphasized the conditions for claiming the rebate, including ownership, business usage, and continuity of operations, all of which were satisfied in this case. The judgment clarified that the conversion of businesses did not disqualify the assessee from claiming the rebate, ultimately upholding her entitlement to the development rebate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:53:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 108 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22982</link>
      <description>The High Court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that she was entitled to the development rebate under section 33 despite the conversion of businesses into partnership concerns. The court emphasized the conditions for claiming the rebate, including ownership, business usage, and continuity of operations, all of which were satisfied in this case. The judgment clarified that the conversion of businesses did not disqualify the assessee from claiming the rebate, ultimately upholding her entitlement to the development rebate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>