<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee Not Deemed Permanent Establishment of M/s DBPL Under Production Services Agreement in India.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54365</link>
    <description>Production Services Agreement - Permanent Establishment (PE) in India - the contract between the two entities was primarily that of a principal and agent. - M/s DBPL was acting as an independent entity which was required to carry out the assigned work independently and the assessee could not said to be PE of that entity in India. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:14:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:14:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee Not Deemed Permanent Establishment of M/s DBPL Under Production Services Agreement in India.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54365</link>
      <description>Production Services Agreement - Permanent Establishment (PE) in India - the contract between the two entities was primarily that of a principal and agent. - M/s DBPL was acting as an independent entity which was required to carry out the assigned work independently and the assessee could not said to be PE of that entity in India. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:14:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>