<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22981</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the interpretation of section 79(b) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the significance of the motive behind transactions and placing the burden of proof on the Income-tax Officer to establish tax avoidance intentions. The Court highlighted that if the change in shareholding was not aimed at tax avoidance, the right to carry forward and set off losses should not be denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:51:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22981</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the interpretation of section 79(b) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the significance of the motive behind transactions and placing the burden of proof on the Income-tax Officer to establish tax avoidance intentions. The Court highlighted that if the change in shareholding was not aimed at tax avoidance, the right to carry forward and set off losses should not be denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>