<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 310 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397367</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee, reducing the disallowed purchase amount related to alleged bogus purchases from 12.5% to 5%. The tribunal emphasized that only the profit element from such purchases should be taxed, not the total purchase amount. Despite the assessee&#039;s evidence supporting the genuineness of the purchases, the lack of conclusive proof led to the decision. The ITAT considered the 12.5% addition rate excessive given the business nature and ordered the AO to limit it to 5% on the alleged bogus purchases for Assessment Year 2009-10.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 10:36:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 310 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397367</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee, reducing the disallowed purchase amount related to alleged bogus purchases from 12.5% to 5%. The tribunal emphasized that only the profit element from such purchases should be taxed, not the total purchase amount. Despite the assessee&#039;s evidence supporting the genuineness of the purchases, the lack of conclusive proof led to the decision. The ITAT considered the 12.5% addition rate excessive given the business nature and ordered the AO to limit it to 5% on the alleged bogus purchases for Assessment Year 2009-10.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>