<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 306 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397363</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the penalty of Rs. 18,390 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal of the assessee was allowed as the Tribunal found that the non-disclosure of interest income and the disallowance of expenses claimed against interest income did not warrant the imposition of penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 19:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 306 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397363</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the penalty of Rs. 18,390 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal of the assessee was allowed as the Tribunal found that the non-disclosure of interest income and the disallowance of expenses claimed against interest income did not warrant the imposition of penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>