https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397351 The Court directed the appellant to deposit 20,00,000 within three months despite arguments for a 7 1/2 % payment, considering the appellant's cessation of production since 2013. The appellant's commitment to pay the duty demanded and the pre-deposit if the Tribunal ruled against them was noted. The judgment underscores the significance of assessing undue hardship for pre-deposit waivers, adherence to post-amendment obligations, and the Court's discretion in setting deposit amounts based on the appellant's circumstances. en-us Wed, 05 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:52:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397351 The Court directed the appellant to deposit 20,00,000 within three months despite arguments for a 7 1/2 % payment, considering the appellant's cessation of production since 2013. The appellant's commitment to pay the duty demanded and the pre-deposit if the Tribunal ruled against them was noted. The judgment underscores the significance of assessing undue hardship for pre-deposit waivers, adherence to post-amendment obligations, and the Court's discretion in setting deposit amounts based on the appellant's circumstances. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397351