<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 292 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397349</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise challenging Final Orders of CESTAT were dismissed by the Court. The Tribunal had allowed the respondents&#039; appeals based on a specific case law, which the appellant did not dispute. However, the appellant argued that since the judgment in the mentioned case was pending before the Apex Court, the appeals should not have been allowed. The Court held that the Department&#039;s instructions for withdrawing appeals based on monetary value applied to pending appeals as well, and since the issues were seized before the Apex Court, the appeals were not maintainable and were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 292 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397349</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise challenging Final Orders of CESTAT were dismissed by the Court. The Tribunal had allowed the respondents&#039; appeals based on a specific case law, which the appellant did not dispute. However, the appellant argued that since the judgment in the mentioned case was pending before the Apex Court, the appeals should not have been allowed. The Court held that the Department&#039;s instructions for withdrawing appeals based on monetary value applied to pending appeals as well, and since the issues were seized before the Apex Court, the appeals were not maintainable and were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>