https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397348 Appellate orders refusing to entertain first appeals for non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition were set aside because the appeals had been declined solely on that ground. The HC noted the amount already recovered and the assessee's willingness to make an additional deposit within a fixed time, and exercised writ jurisdiction to ensure a hearing on merits while preserving compliance with the deposit requirement. The appeals were restored subject to deposit of the additional amount within two weeks, after which they were to be heard on merits. en-us Fri, 07 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:49:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397348 Appellate orders refusing to entertain first appeals for non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition were set aside because the appeals had been declined solely on that ground. The HC noted the amount already recovered and the assessee's willingness to make an additional deposit within a fixed time, and exercised writ jurisdiction to ensure a hearing on merits while preserving compliance with the deposit requirement. The appeals were restored subject to deposit of the additional amount within two weeks, after which they were to be heard on merits. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 07 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397348