<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1890 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289696</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It emphasized functional comparability and consistency in benchmarking international transactions. Specific issues were remanded for further consideration by the CIT(A). The Tribunal excluded Brescon Corporate Advisors Limited as a comparable and allowed the deduction for the bonus paid to directors. Additionally, it remanded the inclusion of Integrated Enterprises India Limited as a comparable back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:35:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1890 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289696</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It emphasized functional comparability and consistency in benchmarking international transactions. Specific issues were remanded for further consideration by the CIT(A). The Tribunal excluded Brescon Corporate Advisors Limited as a comparable and allowed the deduction for the bonus paid to directors. Additionally, it remanded the inclusion of Integrated Enterprises India Limited as a comparable back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>