<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1197 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289701</link>
    <description>An exemption notification granting relief for all kinds of tapes under section 9(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 remained effective even after adhesive tapes were later inserted as a taxable entry in the First Schedule under section 40(1). The power to amend the Schedule was separate from the power to grant or withdraw exemption, and the earlier notification could be revoked only by a subsequent Gazette notification. In the absence of any rescinding or revoking notification, the mere insertion of a taxing entry did not extinguish the exemption. The assessee was therefore entitled to the exemption benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:35:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1197 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289701</link>
      <description>An exemption notification granting relief for all kinds of tapes under section 9(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 remained effective even after adhesive tapes were later inserted as a taxable entry in the First Schedule under section 40(1). The power to amend the Schedule was separate from the power to grant or withdraw exemption, and the earlier notification could be revoked only by a subsequent Gazette notification. In the absence of any rescinding or revoking notification, the mere insertion of a taxing entry did not extinguish the exemption. The assessee was therefore entitled to the exemption benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>