<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (1) TMI 101 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289691</link>
    <description>The court found the detention order under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 to be invalid due to lack of proper application of mind by the detaining authority, insufficient explanation for discharge by the criminal court, and failure to substantiate claim of witness fear. The writ petition was allowed, the rule was made absolute, and the petitioner was directed to be set free.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:10:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (1) TMI 101 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289691</link>
      <description>The court found the detention order under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 to be invalid due to lack of proper application of mind by the detaining authority, insufficient explanation for discharge by the criminal court, and failure to substantiate claim of witness fear. The writ petition was allowed, the rule was made absolute, and the petitioner was directed to be set free.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>