<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 278 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397335</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to restrict the disallowance to 10% of the expenditure towards subcontractors, emphasizing the reasonableness of profit estimation based on historical data. It also supported the Tribunal&#039;s findings regarding the contractors&#039; genuineness and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s contentions. Additionally, the court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling that no addition should be made on account of cessation of liability under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, criticizing the Revenue for filing unnecessary appeals and urging responsible authorities to avoid such litigation in the future.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 278 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397335</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to restrict the disallowance to 10% of the expenditure towards subcontractors, emphasizing the reasonableness of profit estimation based on historical data. It also supported the Tribunal&#039;s findings regarding the contractors&#039; genuineness and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s contentions. Additionally, the court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling that no addition should be made on account of cessation of liability under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, criticizing the Revenue for filing unnecessary appeals and urging responsible authorities to avoid such litigation in the future.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>