<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 275 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397332</link>
    <description>Criminal proceedings for alleged false evidence arising from a judicially ordered enquiry may proceed without a separately filed complaint where the enquiry report forms the basis of the complaint and the prosecution originates in the judicial process. The limitation objection fails where the events constitute a continuous sequence of search, challenge proceedings, enquiry and prosecution, rather than an independent unexplained delay. A No Due Certificate issued after cognizance does not nullify pending prosecution; its evidentiary effect remains a matter for trial. The quashing petition therefore failed, leaving the criminal charges to be tried on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 275 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397332</link>
      <description>Criminal proceedings for alleged false evidence arising from a judicially ordered enquiry may proceed without a separately filed complaint where the enquiry report forms the basis of the complaint and the prosecution originates in the judicial process. The limitation objection fails where the events constitute a continuous sequence of search, challenge proceedings, enquiry and prosecution, rather than an independent unexplained delay. A No Due Certificate issued after cognizance does not nullify pending prosecution; its evidentiary effect remains a matter for trial. The quashing petition therefore failed, leaving the criminal charges to be tried on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>