https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397332 A prosecution under Section 193 IPC was challenged on the ground that no separate complaint under Section 195 CrPC had been filed, but the article states that the proceedings arose from a judicially ordered enquiry and the objection was rejected. The plea that the prosecution was barred by limitation was also rejected, as the sequence of search, challenge proceedings, enquiry and filing of the case was treated as a continuous chain of events. A later No Due Certificate was held not to invalidate an already pending criminal case, with its effect left to trial. The quashing petition therefore failed and the matter was left for trial on merits. en-us Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397332 A prosecution under Section 193 IPC was challenged on the ground that no separate complaint under Section 195 CrPC had been filed, but the article states that the proceedings arose from a judicially ordered enquiry and the objection was rejected. The plea that the prosecution was barred by limitation was also rejected, as the sequence of search, challenge proceedings, enquiry and filing of the case was treated as a continuous chain of events. A later No Due Certificate was held not to invalidate an already pending criminal case, with its effect left to trial. The quashing petition therefore failed and the matter was left for trial on merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397332