<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 266 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397323</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) exceeded his jurisdiction by enhancing the assessment based on disallowing salary expenses, which were not considered by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal quashed the enhancement, ruling in favor of the assessee. The decision was influenced by legal precedents limiting the CIT(A)&#039;s power to enhancing only on sources of income considered by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 10:08:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 266 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397323</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) exceeded his jurisdiction by enhancing the assessment based on disallowing salary expenses, which were not considered by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal quashed the enhancement, ruling in favor of the assessee. The decision was influenced by legal precedents limiting the CIT(A)&#039;s power to enhancing only on sources of income considered by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>