<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 260 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397317</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Ld. CIT(A). The decision was based on the absence of exempt income, following legal precedents and the principle that disallowance under Section 14A is not applicable without exempt income. The Tribunal emphasized this point and ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the deletion of the disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 09:55:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 260 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397317</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Ld. CIT(A). The decision was based on the absence of exempt income, following legal precedents and the principle that disallowance under Section 14A is not applicable without exempt income. The Tribunal emphasized this point and ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the deletion of the disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>