<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1207 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289681</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, and deemed the interest expenditure allowable under section 36(1)(iii) as business expenses. The ITAT held that disallowance under section 14A was not warranted since no exempt income was earned during the relevant year. The decision was based on precedents from various High Courts, including the Bombay and Delhi High Courts, supporting the allowance of interest expenditure if incurred for business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 09:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1207 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289681</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, and deemed the interest expenditure allowable under section 36(1)(iii) as business expenses. The ITAT held that disallowance under section 14A was not warranted since no exempt income was earned during the relevant year. The decision was based on precedents from various High Courts, including the Bombay and Delhi High Courts, supporting the allowance of interest expenditure if incurred for business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>