<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1798 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on the warehousing operator for aiding importers in evading the Additional Duty of Customs (SAD) at a Free Trade Warehousing Zone. The Tribunal found the operator facilitated importers in avoiding SAD payment, leading to demands or penalties. Emphasizing the violation of Customs regulations, the Tribunal rejected the appeals and upheld the penalties, citing a precedent case. The decision aimed to enforce compliance with Customs regulations and deter aiding in duty evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 09:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1798 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on the warehousing operator for aiding importers in evading the Additional Duty of Customs (SAD) at a Free Trade Warehousing Zone. The Tribunal found the operator facilitated importers in avoiding SAD payment, leading to demands or penalties. Emphasizing the violation of Customs regulations, the Tribunal rejected the appeals and upheld the penalties, citing a precedent case. The decision aimed to enforce compliance with Customs regulations and deter aiding in duty evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>