https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397309 The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the bail granted to respondent No.2 but imposed two additional conditions: depositing the passport and disregarding certain High Court findings during trial. Emphasizing the independence of trial proceedings, the Court clarified that High Court findings should not influence the prosecution. The bail order's observations were deemed specific to respondent No.2 and not precedent for other accused. The Special Leave Petition was disposed of, emphasizing the unique evaluation of each co-accused's case and the importance of evidence in trial proceedings. en-us Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397309 The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the bail granted to respondent No.2 but imposed two additional conditions: depositing the passport and disregarding certain High Court findings during trial. Emphasizing the independence of trial proceedings, the Court clarified that High Court findings should not influence the prosecution. The bail order's observations were deemed specific to respondent No.2 and not precedent for other accused. The Special Leave Petition was disposed of, emphasizing the unique evaluation of each co-accused's case and the importance of evidence in trial proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397309