<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1580 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289669</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the reopening of assessment under section 147 based on valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment. The disallowance under sections 36(1)(iii) and 14A was set aside for reconsideration in light of the non-retrospective application of Rule 8D as per the Bombay High Court decision. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 4th February 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:07:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1580 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289669</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming the reopening of assessment under section 147 based on valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment. The disallowance under sections 36(1)(iii) and 14A was set aside for reconsideration in light of the non-retrospective application of Rule 8D as per the Bombay High Court decision. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 4th February 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>