<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 131 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22964</link>
    <description>Cash payments were held to fall within rule 6DD(j) where the Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation and found the transactions genuine. Because no perversity or lack of supporting material was shown in that factual appreciation, the exemption was available and the assessee was entitled to relief under the rule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 131 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22964</link>
      <description>Cash payments were held to fall within rule 6DD(j) where the Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation and found the transactions genuine. Because no perversity or lack of supporting material was shown in that factual appreciation, the exemption was available and the assessee was entitled to relief under the rule.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>