<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 971 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289666</link>
    <description>The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires strict compliance with the parties&#039; agreed arbitrator-appointment procedure. Section 15(2) permits substitution only where an arbitrator&#039;s mandate has terminated under Section 15(1), which covers withdrawal from office or termination by agreement; it does not apply when a nominated arbitrator merely refuses the appointment before entering upon the reference. The term &quot;rules&quot; in Section 15(2) includes the contractual appointment mechanism itself. In the absence of any contractual provision authorising substitution in that situation, a party cannot bypass the agreed procedure and seek appointment of a third arbitrator under Section 11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:06:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 971 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289666</link>
      <description>The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 requires strict compliance with the parties&#039; agreed arbitrator-appointment procedure. Section 15(2) permits substitution only where an arbitrator&#039;s mandate has terminated under Section 15(1), which covers withdrawal from office or termination by agreement; it does not apply when a nominated arbitrator merely refuses the appointment before entering upon the reference. The term &quot;rules&quot; in Section 15(2) includes the contractual appointment mechanism itself. In the absence of any contractual provision authorising substitution in that situation, a party cannot bypass the agreed procedure and seek appointment of a third arbitrator under Section 11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>