https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22962 Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act confined the appropriate authority to examining the statement under section 269UC, deciding whether the Central Government should purchase the property under section 269UD, or issuing a certificate under section 269UL if no purchase order was made or the order abated. The authority could not probe the legality or validity of the transfer by reference to the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, municipal laws, or a separate adjoining property, nor reopen a title finding already recognised under the urban land law. The Delhi HC held the refusal of the certificate to be beyond jurisdiction and set aside the order. en-us Fri, 14 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:57:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22962 Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act confined the appropriate authority to examining the statement under section 269UC, deciding whether the Central Government should purchase the property under section 269UD, or issuing a certificate under section 269UL if no purchase order was made or the order abated. The authority could not probe the legality or validity of the transfer by reference to the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, municipal laws, or a separate adjoining property, nor reopen a title finding already recognised under the urban land law. The Delhi HC held the refusal of the certificate to be beyond jurisdiction and set aside the order. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 14 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22962