<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Inconsistencies Found in Tax Returns: Dual Policy by Assessee u/s 153C Raises Concerns About Incriminating Material.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54335</link>
    <description>Assessment u/s.153C - incriminating material found during the course of search or not - It is beyond the scope of our understanding that as to why figures are different in both the returns submitted by the assessee with the income tax department, whereas the auditor and the date of audit report is also same in the both the returns. - The dual policy taken by the assessee cannot be accepted. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:38:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:38:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Inconsistencies Found in Tax Returns: Dual Policy by Assessee u/s 153C Raises Concerns About Incriminating Material.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54335</link>
      <description>Assessment u/s.153C - incriminating material found during the course of search or not - It is beyond the scope of our understanding that as to why figures are different in both the returns submitted by the assessee with the income tax department, whereas the auditor and the date of audit report is also same in the both the returns. - The dual policy taken by the assessee cannot be accepted. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:38:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>