https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397275 Where interest is proposed under Section 42(3) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and the taxpayer disputes the computation, the authority must first furnish the interest calculation, allow the taxpayer to pay or raise objections, and then decide those objections after hearing the taxpayer. The petitioner's liability to tax for the relevant month was not in dispute, but its request for consideration of interest on available credit was left for the authority to examine. The writ petition was disposed of with directions for reconsideration and no final adjudication on the merits. en-us Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397275 Where interest is proposed under Section 42(3) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and the taxpayer disputes the computation, the authority must first furnish the interest calculation, allow the taxpayer to pay or raise objections, and then decide those objections after hearing the taxpayer. The petitioner's liability to tax for the relevant month was not in dispute, but its request for consideration of interest on available credit was left for the authority to examine. The writ petition was disposed of with directions for reconsideration and no final adjudication on the merits. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397275