https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397274 A member of a statutory body could not maintain a writ petition or appeal in a representative or derivative capacity where the body was a separate legal entity capable of suing in its own name, and no disabling inability to act was shown. The challenge was therefore not maintainable at the member's instance. On the alleged misuse of the acronym ICAI, the Court noted that statutory and trade mark enforcement remedies belonged to the legally entitled body, not to a member acting individually. No mandamus or injunctive relief was warranted on the material before the Court, and the impugned order was upheld. en-us Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:32:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397274 A member of a statutory body could not maintain a writ petition or appeal in a representative or derivative capacity where the body was a separate legal entity capable of suing in its own name, and no disabling inability to act was shown. The challenge was therefore not maintainable at the member's instance. On the alleged misuse of the acronym ICAI, the Court noted that statutory and trade mark enforcement remedies belonged to the legally entitled body, not to a member acting individually. No mandamus or injunctive relief was warranted on the material before the Court, and the impugned order was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397274