<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 216 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397273</link>
    <description>Cheque dishonour liability requires proof that the cheque was issued towards a legally enforceable debt or liability. Contemporaneous notices and the reply notice referred to two blank signed cheques already held by the complainant and identified the cheque subsequently relied upon. These surrounding circumstances created doubt about the claimed later issuance of the cheque. The accused therefore raised a probable defence sufficient to rebut the presumption that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable liability, and the offence was not established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:32:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 216 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397273</link>
      <description>Cheque dishonour liability requires proof that the cheque was issued towards a legally enforceable debt or liability. Contemporaneous notices and the reply notice referred to two blank signed cheques already held by the complainant and identified the cheque subsequently relied upon. These surrounding circumstances created doubt about the claimed later issuance of the cheque. The accused therefore raised a probable defence sufficient to rebut the presumption that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable liability, and the offence was not established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>