https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397271 The High Court dismissed the revisionist's petition to quash the impugned order dated 11.11.2019, which convicted the revisionist under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for dishonoring a cheque. Despite multiple opportunities and court directions to deposit the fine amount, the revisionist failed to comply, leading to the dismissal of appeals. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to court orders and directed the revisionist to deposit fifty percent of the fine amount within 30 days for the appeal to proceed. en-us Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Aug 2020 09:31:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397271 The High Court dismissed the revisionist's petition to quash the impugned order dated 11.11.2019, which convicted the revisionist under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for dishonoring a cheque. Despite multiple opportunities and court directions to deposit the fine amount, the revisionist failed to comply, leading to the dismissal of appeals. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to court orders and directed the revisionist to deposit fifty percent of the fine amount within 30 days for the appeal to proceed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397271