https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397270 The revisionist challenged a judgment convicting them under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was upheld by the court. Despite arguments regarding defects in the notice and complaint, the court found them unsubstantiated. The revision was dismissed, and the revisionist was taken into custody for non-compliance with the interim order to deposit a sum. The court affirmed the conviction under Section 138 of the Act. en-us Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Aug 2020 21:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397270 The revisionist challenged a judgment convicting them under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was upheld by the court. Despite arguments regarding defects in the notice and complaint, the court found them unsubstantiated. The revision was dismissed, and the revisionist was taken into custody for non-compliance with the interim order to deposit a sum. The court affirmed the conviction under Section 138 of the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397270