<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 212 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397269</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted in proceedings under the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 because the petitioner had spent about 10 months in custody, the alleged offence carried a maximum sentence of 5 years, and the trial was not likely to conclude soon. The pending challenge to the vires of the Act was also noted. On these facts, continued incarceration was considered unnecessary, and the interim directions were made absolute on the same terms and conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 212 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397269</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted in proceedings under the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 because the petitioner had spent about 10 months in custody, the alleged offence carried a maximum sentence of 5 years, and the trial was not likely to conclude soon. The pending challenge to the vires of the Act was also noted. On these facts, continued incarceration was considered unnecessary, and the interim directions were made absolute on the same terms and conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>