https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397262 The Court allowed the impleading of respondent HDFC Bank in the case under Order 1 Rule 10. The writ petition seeking to quash the provisional attachment of bank accounts and property under the PGST/CGST Act was disposed of, directing the defreezing of all accounts and maintaining the balance present at the time of attachment. The Court's decision was based on the acknowledgment of the overdrawn amount and lack of opposition from the respondent, leading to a fair resolution of the matter. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397262 The Court allowed the impleading of respondent HDFC Bank in the case under Order 1 Rule 10. The writ petition seeking to quash the provisional attachment of bank accounts and property under the PGST/CGST Act was disposed of, directing the defreezing of all accounts and maintaining the balance present at the time of attachment. The Court's decision was based on the acknowledgment of the overdrawn amount and lack of opposition from the respondent, leading to a fair resolution of the matter. Case-Laws GST Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397262