<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 202 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397259</link>
    <description>A petitioner challenging an order and demand under section 129(3) of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. The HC directed that any appeal filed within the stipulated period be taken on record and decided in accordance with law, and it excluded the time spent in the writ petition for limitation purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 202 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397259</link>
      <description>A petitioner challenging an order and demand under section 129(3) of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. The HC directed that any appeal filed within the stipulated period be taken on record and decided in accordance with law, and it excluded the time spent in the writ petition for limitation purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>