https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289651 The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of CENVAT credit and penalty under Section 78. It directed re-computation of cum-tax value and verification of related documents, emphasizing no suppression of facts or intent to evade service tax payment. The dispute on double taxation was resolved in favor of the appellant, remanding the matter for re-computation of cum-tax value and document verification. The tribunal acknowledged proper service tax collection issues due to bank computerization and cited relevant CBEC instructions in its decision. en-us Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:02:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289651 The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of CENVAT credit and penalty under Section 78. It directed re-computation of cum-tax value and verification of related documents, emphasizing no suppression of facts or intent to evade service tax payment. The dispute on double taxation was resolved in favor of the appellant, remanding the matter for re-computation of cum-tax value and document verification. The tribunal acknowledged proper service tax collection issues due to bank computerization and cited relevant CBEC instructions in its decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289651