https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22953 Remuneration paid to a karta of a Hindu undivided family for managing the business was treated as an allowable deduction where the payment was genuine and not unreasonable. The absence of specific evidence that the family income, apart from share income from the firm, required commensurate services did not by itself justify disallowance. The governing principle applied was that, once no legal bar exists and the compensation is bona fide, the claim cannot be rejected merely because additional income or special necessity for the services is not specifically proved. The allowance of Rs. 9,000 was upheld. en-us Fri, 10 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:32:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22953 Remuneration paid to a karta of a Hindu undivided family for managing the business was treated as an allowable deduction where the payment was genuine and not unreasonable. The absence of specific evidence that the family income, apart from share income from the firm, required commensurate services did not by itself justify disallowance. The governing principle applied was that, once no legal bar exists and the compensation is bona fide, the claim cannot be rejected merely because additional income or special necessity for the services is not specifically proved. The allowance of Rs. 9,000 was upheld. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 10 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22953