<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 200 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397257</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax case appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenge regarding discrepancies in export sales and purchases, lack of documentary evidence for stock levels, alleged Rule 46A violation, and applicability of the matching principle in cash method accounting for Assessment Year 2006-2007. The Court found no substantial question of law, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:32:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 200 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397257</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax case appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenge regarding discrepancies in export sales and purchases, lack of documentary evidence for stock levels, alleged Rule 46A violation, and applicability of the matching principle in cash method accounting for Assessment Year 2006-2007. The Court found no substantial question of law, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>