<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 199 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397256</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that since the assessee was assessed under Section 115JB, the penalty could not be imposed for additions made under normal provisions. The penalty order was deemed invalid, and the appeal was allowed, setting aside the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 199 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397256</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that since the assessee was assessed under Section 115JB, the penalty could not be imposed for additions made under normal provisions. The penalty order was deemed invalid, and the appeal was allowed, setting aside the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>