<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 194 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397251</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The assessee trust was deemed eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, with the proviso to Section 2(15) found inapplicable. Additionally, the carry forward of excess capital expenditure was permitted. These conclusions were grounded in established legal precedents and statutory interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 194 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397251</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The assessee trust was deemed eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, with the proviso to Section 2(15) found inapplicable. Additionally, the carry forward of excess capital expenditure was permitted. These conclusions were grounded in established legal precedents and statutory interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>