<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1936 (5) TMI 35 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289642</link>
    <description>A sub-lease created by mortgage by way of sub-demise may bind the sub-lessee to a restrictive covenant protecting the lessor&#039;s reversionary interest, even without direct privity, where the sub-lessee has notice. In assessing damages for wrongful working of mineral property, ordinary working expenses such as severance and carriage may be deducted from gross value, but a stricter approach applies to secret depillaring or fraudulent working, permitting only limited deductions consistent with the proof. A separate award for dewatering was not supported without evidence linking flooding to the defendants&#039; acts, so that component falls away.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:27:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1936 (5) TMI 35 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289642</link>
      <description>A sub-lease created by mortgage by way of sub-demise may bind the sub-lessee to a restrictive covenant protecting the lessor&#039;s reversionary interest, even without direct privity, where the sub-lessee has notice. In assessing damages for wrongful working of mineral property, ordinary working expenses such as severance and carriage may be deducted from gross value, but a stricter approach applies to secret depillaring or fraudulent working, permitting only limited deductions consistent with the proof. A separate award for dewatering was not supported without evidence linking flooding to the defendants&#039; acts, so that component falls away.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>