<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1797 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289640</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invalidated the penalty order due to a vague and invalid notice issued under Section 274, leading to the quashing of the enhancement of penalty under Section 271AAB by the CIT(A). Emphasizing the importance of clear and specific notices for penalty proceedings, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the penalty order, highlighting the need to adhere to principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:28:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1797 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289640</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invalidated the penalty order due to a vague and invalid notice issued under Section 274, leading to the quashing of the enhancement of penalty under Section 271AAB by the CIT(A). Emphasizing the importance of clear and specific notices for penalty proceedings, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the penalty order, highlighting the need to adhere to principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>