<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 166 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397223</link>
    <description>The tribunal cancelled the revision order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee had adequately supported their claims during assessment proceedings. The tribunal referred to precedents and determined that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the procedural delay in issuing the order was deemed justified due to the COVID-19 pandemic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:57:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=619413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 166 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397223</link>
      <description>The tribunal cancelled the revision order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee had adequately supported their claims during assessment proceedings. The tribunal referred to precedents and determined that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the procedural delay in issuing the order was deemed justified due to the COVID-19 pandemic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>