https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397217 The High Court upheld the Single Judge's decision to not exercise discretion under Article 226, directing the assessee to utilize statutory remedies. The appellant was instructed to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal within one month. Concerns about potential bias were addressed by appointing a different Deputy Commissioner as the appellate authority. The appellant's remittance of 20% tax raised recovery issues, with the Court allowing the appellant to address this before the appropriate authorities. The Writ appeal was disposed of, providing guidance on the appeal process and tax remittance pending appeal proceedings. en-us Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397217 The High Court upheld the Single Judge's decision to not exercise discretion under Article 226, directing the assessee to utilize statutory remedies. The appellant was instructed to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal within one month. Concerns about potential bias were addressed by appointing a different Deputy Commissioner as the appellate authority. The appellant's remittance of 20% tax raised recovery issues, with the Court allowing the appellant to address this before the appropriate authorities. The Writ appeal was disposed of, providing guidance on the appeal process and tax remittance pending appeal proceedings. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397217