https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289624 Order XLI Rule 27 CPC permits additional evidence in appeal not only where the appellate court requires it to pronounce judgment, but also where there is substantial cause; contemporaneous, registered documents relevant to the real controversy were therefore admissible. On the construction issue, revenue and lease records showed that Damodarpur Lakhawar was treated as one composite unit, so the mokarari pottah referred to all three mouzahs and not merely one village. The decrees below were set aside and the suit dismissed after the additional evidence was admitted and the grant was construed as covering all three villages. en-us Tue, 15 May 1923 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Aug 2020 10:35:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289624 Order XLI Rule 27 CPC permits additional evidence in appeal not only where the appellate court requires it to pronounce judgment, but also where there is substantial cause; contemporaneous, registered documents relevant to the real controversy were therefore admissible. On the construction issue, revenue and lease records showed that Damodarpur Lakhawar was treated as one composite unit, so the mokarari pottah referred to all three mouzahs and not merely one village. The decrees below were set aside and the suit dismissed after the additional evidence was admitted and the grant was construed as covering all three villages. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 May 1923 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289624